Litigants should try to argue simple cases of minor dispute, promotions and service aspects because they are familiar with their office environment and procedures. Of course, serious matters requiring serious interpretation of law and procedural matters need to be taken up by professionals. more
Viewed by 14
It is impractical. Judges should & Must be Impartial at-least technically if not practically. It is to clarify once again that Judges can't review his own Order Pronounced unless there is grave technical error like instead of ABC name it is written as XYZ. This is technical error, else there is only remedy of appeal. more
May 27
Remedy lies in judges being made accountable to pay the litigant put to inconvenience and expenses involved in rectification. They cannot be allowed absolute freedom of being negligent. Alternately, litigants should be entitled to approach the same court in person or through his lawyer, and point out the lacuna without the rigmarole of filing a formal revision application through the lawyer. On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:18 AM, UDAY GB wrote: > more
May 27
Remedy lies in judges being made accountable to pay the litigant put to inconvenience and expenses involved in rectification. They cannot be allowed absolute freedom of being negligent. Alternately, litigants should be entitled to approach the same court in person or through his lawyer, and point out the lacuna without the rigmarole of filing a formal revision application through the lawyer. more
May 27
