2. The Supreme court earlier directed a person aged beyond 60 , to conduct Sex efficiency Test in a case he was the reported Rapist by his office Staff.
3. The Supreme court had again this year only squashed the judgment of a Tamilnadu High court where verdict was awarded closing the file since the Rapist and the person Raped were settled out of the court strictly on such of this Nirbhaya issue of Rape .
4. In this present case of the Minor , the Supreme court Bench had not ascertained the sexual capacity or , the production of Sperm by the convict since the issue of production of Sperm is the main issue of one’s capacity of Sex intercourse and not the age .
5. This natural fact of grounds though not the Indian Culture and Heritage of India is not to be set aside or set off at any consideration and any Foreign practice of Justice and Human Rights and Responsibilities .
6. There is absolute need of referring this case with the above points to the Constitutional Bench of the Country and also necessarily to be referred to the Central Law Commission please . I request all the relevant associations , societies and bodies to kindly try for a justified judgment without confining only to the textual right of any pertinent and related law s . If the textual derivation only is the prime under law , the loop-hole of the law is to be rectified in this and with this case itself please . more