jury system can end monopoly of judges
Signed 12/3000
Online Signatures: 12
To
Prime Minister of India
presidentofindia@rb.nic.in
Most people who seek justice today in India are apprehensive about the honesty of our legal frame work.Not only the advocates are mostly unprofessionals and are seeking to fleece the justice seeker but the whole chain of people involved in delivering justice are unreliabe as per perception of most Indians.
It is therefore necessary that legal system is revamped.Introduction of a jury system will go a long way in breaking the monopoly of the judges who as per reports and experiences of people,are highly corrupt.
India has a large population of educated,honest population who can be used as jurors and the computers can be used to choose the jury whenever required,so that corruption does not mar the jury system as well.
INDIA MUST VOTE FOR JURY SYSTEM TO END MONOPOLY OF JUDGES!
It is therefore necessary that legal system is revamped.Introduction of a jury system will go a long way in breaking the monopoly of the judges who as per reports and experiences of people,are highly corrupt.
India has a large population of educated,honest population who can be used as jurors and the computers can be used to choose the jury whenever required,so that corruption does not mar the jury system as well.
INDIA MUST VOTE FOR JURY SYSTEM TO END MONOPOLY OF JUDGES!
The Petition was also marked to:
LAW MINISTER OF INDIA
- kg.thang@nic.in
Legal Advise and MattersAug 30
Jury system can end this judge monopoly and can break the nexus between lawyers and judges to make justice unreachable for the common man. more
1 ALL PLEADINGS OF ADVOCATES AND COURT JUDGEMENTS TO BE SPECIFIC WITH AND AROUND RULE OF LAW OFFENDED, DEFENDED & CLAIMS ONLY. ALL VAGUE, GENERAL AND BASELESS PLEADINGS SHOULD BE PUNISHABLE.
2 ANY DEPARTURE OF ADVOCATES/JUDGES FROM RULE OF LAW SHOULD BE SPELT OUT MANDATORILY WITH PUNISHMENT IN EVERY ORDER WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE RULE OF LAW OFFENDED, DEFENDED & CLAIMS. EVERY WRONG/ILLEGAL/UNTENABLE PLEADING 2 B PUNISHABLE AND TO BE SPECIFIED AS A MANDATORY PART IN EVERY ORDER/JUDGEMENT. INHERENT DISCRITION TO BE USED WITH SPECIFIC EXPLAINATION TO BE GIVEN MANDATORILY IN UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW OR AIMS & OBJECTIVES OF RULE OF LAW UNDER SUBJECT.
3 THE JUDICIARY SHOULD BE EQUIPPED WITH INTERNAL RESOURCES TO DELIVER JUDGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF SIMPLE APPLICATION DIRECTLY FROM LITIGANT. JUDICIARY NOT TO INSIST FOR EMPLOYMENT OF ADVOCATE. LITIGANT CAN HAVE OPTION OF SEEKING ADVOCATE SERVICES WITHOUT ANY ILLEGAL/WRONG HARASSMENT TO THE OTHERSIDE. ADVOCATE TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE WITH PUNISHMENT FOR WRONG/UNTENABLE PLEAS FAILURE 2 SCREEN OUT ILLEGALITIES.
4 NOT A SINGLE ADJOURNMENT TO BE ALLOWED FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN OF LACK OF TIME OF JUDGE, ATLEAST WHEN ADVOCATE IS REPRESENTING THE CASE.
4a EVERY FRIVOLOUS, ILLEGAL, VEXATIOUS WITHOUT SERIOUS PURSUANCE SHOULD BE DISPOSED WITH INVARIABLE PUNISHMENT.
4b EVERY ORDER SHOULD PROCEED AUTOMATICALLY TO A LOGICAL END, OR AND SPECIFY FURTHER AUTOMATIC PROCEEDINGS FOR APPEAL/EXECUTION BEYOND SPECIFIC PERIOD WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. NO ORDER SHOULD BE LEFT UNEXECUTED.
5 EVERY BAR ASOCIATION TO DISPLAY PUBLIC GRADING OF ADVOCATES ON THE BASIS OF QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE, CASES REPRESENTED CIVIL/CRIMINAL/OTHER IN THE CAPACITY OF TRAINEE, ASSISTANT, ADVOCATE, SR. ADVOCATE, COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND CASE PENDING PERIODWISE/WON/LOST/SETTLED/ETC. CASES PENDING AGAINST THE ADVOCATE SHOULD ALSO BE DECLARED.
6 FACILITIES FOR LITIGANTS LIKE SITTING/WAITING ROOM WITHOUT ADVOCATES AND ADVERTISEMENTS, ACCESS TO COURT LIBRARY, RELEVANT COURT STATIONERY COUNTER, TOILETS/WASHING ROOMS, PARKING IN EVERY COURT. LIBRARIES SHOULD CONTAIN FORMATS OF ALL SUITS, APPLICATIONS, APPEALS AND OTHER ESSENTIAL PROCEDURES B4 COURTS.
THESE STEPS WILL GO LONG WAY IN FURTHER IMPROVEMENT IN DELIVERY OF JUSTICE. more