Can Narendra Modi Deliver - Great Piece by Atanu Dey
India will certainly have a new government in place after the results of the on-going general elections are declared on May 16th, and it is nearly certain that it will be a coalition government headed by Narendra Modi of the BJP.
Many Indians desperately hope that Modi be able to bring about an improvement in India’s economic fortunes. Expectations are high—but will he be able to deliver?
The answer is a very ambiguous “it depends.”
That’s because the prime minister, as the head of the central government, has power to formulate and execute economic policies, but that power is severely limited in a coalition government.
India’s two-house parliament
To pass laws and amendments, the prime minister has to have the support of a majority of the lower house of the parliament (the Lok Sabha) which consists of 543 members. Those are the members being chosen in the current election, and here many expect the BJP and its allies to win the minimum 272 seats needed.
But the upper house of the parliament (the Rajya Sabha) with its 250 members also needs to pass any bills and amendments before they are adopted. These members sit six year terms, and right now the BJP and allies have only 61. Other parties, and particularly the Congress Party, which alone has 72 seats, have the power and the incentive to put a spanner in the works of the best laid schemes of Modi. In other words, Modi will face significant hurdles in whatever economic plan he wishes to implement.
Modi’s enemies don’t want India to work
It is an understatement to say that Modi has powerful political enemies, some within his own party. The primary reason for that is that he is an outsider: a self-made man who does not belong to the club of the elite that has been ruling India for 60-odd years. He does not have a stake in the perpetuation of the system that has kept India abjectly poor and mostly illiterate—one in which the government has near-absolute control of the economy. Those in government have the power to implement policies that are good for them, but are harmful to the people at large.
India is a cautionary tale of what happens to a country because of bad economic policies. It is not alone, of course. As Nobel prize-winning economist Douglass North observed “economic history is overwhelmingly a story of economies that failed to produce a set of economic rules of the game (with enforcement) that induce sustained economic growth.”
But producing a set of rational economic rules is a political rather than an economic process. Frequently, basic economic truths are willfully disregarded in a myopic but cynically calculated process of short-term electoral gains. In the long run, however, the persistent practice of politically motivated economically unsound policies has the unsurprising and unfortunate effect of impoverishing the economy.
Modi is not interested in personal enrichment—something you can’t say about many of the politicians who have shaped India’s economic policies to date. Therefore if he comes to power, he will disrupt the old order and those who are flourishing in the present system will do their best to undermine any attempts he makes to bring about fundamental change.
That is probably the most significant hurdle that Modi will face.
The bureaucracy slows everything down
There is another significant barrier to any reforms: the bureaucracy. Indian bureaucracy is gloriously notorious for impeding any process, good or bad. It is a vast and implacable machinery created by the British to administer colonial India, and India inherited it lock, stock and barrel, and then has done little to change it in the years since. The bureaucracy will do its best to retard India’s progress, simply because such progress means a reduction in bureaucratic power and control.
What he can actually get done
All of that does not mean that Modi will not be able to bring about any changes. As the chief of Gujarat state over a dozen years, he has been able to manage the state bureaucratic machinery and deliver good growth in all sectors of the state economy. He did this, and what is more, he did it in the face of a politically motivated relentless witch-hunt by his many detractors.
There is hope that as the prime minister, Modi will be able to meet at least part of the expectations of renewed growth. Certainly he will not be able to make any major structural changes in the short run. For that to happen, he needs greater political support in both houses of the parliament. But in the short run, even as the leader of a coalition government, there are low-hanging fruits which can be picked profitably:
Although Modi will not be able to radically reduce the bureaucracy (which would have been simply wonderful for the economy) he will be able to make it more accountable and responsive to the needs of the people. With the reduction in red tape, industrial growth will improve, and consequently increase employment in the formal sector.
He could reduce the number and rationalize the number of government departments (or “ministries”) so that the government intervention and micro-management of the economy is significantly reduced. This will make government leaner and lead to more efficient use of public funds.
He could restructure the way public assistance is given to the poor. Currently it is a rat’s nest of complicated schemes of subsidies, all created for the ostensible purpose of helping the poor but most of the spending ends up being siphoned away. A direct cash transfer scheme to those below the poverty line will not only reach the target but also reduce the cost to the public. This will definitely have popular support although it will not be popular with those administering the current complex system.
Socialism is not the future
In the long run, India will progress only through structural reforms. Socialism has failed in India, as it has elsewhere. It has proved to be a friend of poverty, not a friend of the poor. What India, and Indians, needs most is economic freedom. Indians are not congenitally incapable of producing wealth. In all places around the world where they have economic freedom, Indians prosper remarkably.
That Indians in India are poor is not due to some natural law. India’s poverty is unnatural, in the sense that it is an artifact of human design and action.
India is a democracy, and its government is “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Its economic policies and the consequent poverty are also of the people, by the people, and for the people. But India needs economic freedom for its political freedom to be meaningful.
Modi cannot transform India; he does not have the power. No one person does; only Indians collectively do. more
Many Indians desperately hope that Modi be able to bring about an improvement in India’s economic fortunes. Expectations are high—but will he be able to deliver?
The answer is a very ambiguous “it depends.”
That’s because the prime minister, as the head of the central government, has power to formulate and execute economic policies, but that power is severely limited in a coalition government.
India’s two-house parliament
To pass laws and amendments, the prime minister has to have the support of a majority of the lower house of the parliament (the Lok Sabha) which consists of 543 members. Those are the members being chosen in the current election, and here many expect the BJP and its allies to win the minimum 272 seats needed.
But the upper house of the parliament (the Rajya Sabha) with its 250 members also needs to pass any bills and amendments before they are adopted. These members sit six year terms, and right now the BJP and allies have only 61. Other parties, and particularly the Congress Party, which alone has 72 seats, have the power and the incentive to put a spanner in the works of the best laid schemes of Modi. In other words, Modi will face significant hurdles in whatever economic plan he wishes to implement.
Modi’s enemies don’t want India to work
It is an understatement to say that Modi has powerful political enemies, some within his own party. The primary reason for that is that he is an outsider: a self-made man who does not belong to the club of the elite that has been ruling India for 60-odd years. He does not have a stake in the perpetuation of the system that has kept India abjectly poor and mostly illiterate—one in which the government has near-absolute control of the economy. Those in government have the power to implement policies that are good for them, but are harmful to the people at large.
India is a cautionary tale of what happens to a country because of bad economic policies. It is not alone, of course. As Nobel prize-winning economist Douglass North observed “economic history is overwhelmingly a story of economies that failed to produce a set of economic rules of the game (with enforcement) that induce sustained economic growth.”
But producing a set of rational economic rules is a political rather than an economic process. Frequently, basic economic truths are willfully disregarded in a myopic but cynically calculated process of short-term electoral gains. In the long run, however, the persistent practice of politically motivated economically unsound policies has the unsurprising and unfortunate effect of impoverishing the economy.
Modi is not interested in personal enrichment—something you can’t say about many of the politicians who have shaped India’s economic policies to date. Therefore if he comes to power, he will disrupt the old order and those who are flourishing in the present system will do their best to undermine any attempts he makes to bring about fundamental change.
That is probably the most significant hurdle that Modi will face.
The bureaucracy slows everything down
There is another significant barrier to any reforms: the bureaucracy. Indian bureaucracy is gloriously notorious for impeding any process, good or bad. It is a vast and implacable machinery created by the British to administer colonial India, and India inherited it lock, stock and barrel, and then has done little to change it in the years since. The bureaucracy will do its best to retard India’s progress, simply because such progress means a reduction in bureaucratic power and control.
What he can actually get done
All of that does not mean that Modi will not be able to bring about any changes. As the chief of Gujarat state over a dozen years, he has been able to manage the state bureaucratic machinery and deliver good growth in all sectors of the state economy. He did this, and what is more, he did it in the face of a politically motivated relentless witch-hunt by his many detractors.
There is hope that as the prime minister, Modi will be able to meet at least part of the expectations of renewed growth. Certainly he will not be able to make any major structural changes in the short run. For that to happen, he needs greater political support in both houses of the parliament. But in the short run, even as the leader of a coalition government, there are low-hanging fruits which can be picked profitably:
Although Modi will not be able to radically reduce the bureaucracy (which would have been simply wonderful for the economy) he will be able to make it more accountable and responsive to the needs of the people. With the reduction in red tape, industrial growth will improve, and consequently increase employment in the formal sector.
He could reduce the number and rationalize the number of government departments (or “ministries”) so that the government intervention and micro-management of the economy is significantly reduced. This will make government leaner and lead to more efficient use of public funds.
He could restructure the way public assistance is given to the poor. Currently it is a rat’s nest of complicated schemes of subsidies, all created for the ostensible purpose of helping the poor but most of the spending ends up being siphoned away. A direct cash transfer scheme to those below the poverty line will not only reach the target but also reduce the cost to the public. This will definitely have popular support although it will not be popular with those administering the current complex system.
Socialism is not the future
In the long run, India will progress only through structural reforms. Socialism has failed in India, as it has elsewhere. It has proved to be a friend of poverty, not a friend of the poor. What India, and Indians, needs most is economic freedom. Indians are not congenitally incapable of producing wealth. In all places around the world where they have economic freedom, Indians prosper remarkably.
That Indians in India are poor is not due to some natural law. India’s poverty is unnatural, in the sense that it is an artifact of human design and action.
India is a democracy, and its government is “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Its economic policies and the consequent poverty are also of the people, by the people, and for the people. But India needs economic freedom for its political freedom to be meaningful.
Modi cannot transform India; he does not have the power. No one person does; only Indians collectively do. more
Viewed by 472
View all 13 comments Below 13 comments
A well thought out and realistic article. People who know how things happen in real life, particularly in coalition govts, do not expect things and systems to change overnight. It will have to be sustained and imaginative effort to put things right, not by Narendar Modi alone, but by his entire team as well as by other supporting people. Let us hope BJP by itself is able to secure near absolute majority and will be less dependent on allies and outside support. With large number of seats in Lok Sabha, the composition of Rajya Sabha will also become favourable with time. more
May 04
A very well written article, Sheetal. Ofcourse I do not agree with all of it. But first a question for my knowledge.: If a bill is not passed in the Rajya Sabha, then does it not go back to the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha has to pass it on re-presentation ? Your article does highlight many significant issues that have impeded our growth.But again , like all of us, it is reflection of our conditioning and mind set that has developed over the decades - rules , rules , and rules. AND control, control and control. A tweak here and a twist there will not change our fundamental thinking. If Mr. Modi has to deliver , he has to COMPLETELY overhaul our system , our laws our rules and then the mind set of those implementing all policies. For example the Income Tax Act does not need to have changes but a completely new Income Tax law has to be written. Or the VAT laws cannot refer to ammendments and determinations in general ( section so and so with sub section this and that and where each of so and so or this and that further refer to section so and so .... and so on. Thus to find one simple answer one has refer to multiple sections and most of these are subjective and with with exceptions to.... and so on ). Or the Police laws can be subject to so many kinds of misuse and abuse and laws afer laws and governing every small aspect of our life. And then to legalise so many activities that are a part of people's lives now but are considered illegal. Thus legalise betting as it is allowed in most parts of the world and thus the authorities do not have to focus on controlling betting but rather control on betting that inflences activities ; legalise prostitution and thus ensure health of people as well limit crimes of passion ; legalise ....and so on The basic nature of a majority of human beings is to look after self interest . Thus you will buy a tooth paste from the shop that offers a lower price. Similarly our economic policies should take that into consideration and thus be based on realities of life. Why should the policies expect citizens to be altruistic. The parallel economy is so huge and all we talk about catching those who have stashed illegal money abroad. What about policies that will bring this money into our mainstream economy and contribute to its growth. I don't mean amnesty schemes but a thought process that can bring this money back into our economy without penalising honest tax payers who have being paying their taxes. But this money can be brought back only with practical schemes that work , a random example can be an amnesty based on investment in infrastructure or even rural development or in linking rivers Mr. Modi has performed well in Gujarat but that is his personal effort. What would happen if he moves out of Gujarat - we may end up in being back to 'square one !' No it is the laws that have to incentivise people so that we can flourish Despite its evils, we do need the bureaucracy. Who will implement and govern ? The solution is to make them work within a framework of laws that are progressive and not where subsidies are in their control but implemented by a self propogating system. And lets not forget that there are honest bureaucrats too. What is needed is re employing these bureaucrats to other areas of changed priorities as , for example in linking rivers, etc. The mainline systems should be designed in a manner that control is not required and then control over control and then vigilance above. Why give the citizen an incentive to do wrong as opposed to incentivising them to earn and bring prosperity. Only then will our local population do as well as our NRI population or even better. Yes, very stringent punishment should be provided to those officials who are caught misusing their position as opposed to ordinary citizens being punished under laws that are a maze of imponderables. And re-training of bureacrats is of paramount importance. Mr. Modi will perform because he understands human nature. Ofcourse there will be hiccups but then he has so many capable people in the NDA. The paramount task in front of him will be to change the attitude of even those who will be his trusted colleagues to make them think "out of the box". Attitudes that have been developed over decades of conditioning . Maybe he could try and draw good people from other political parties as decision makers ( I do not mean poaching or defections ). Changing the mind set of even his own people will be his main challenge ! more
May 04
Mr. Modi has been an example not just for Gujarat but as a person with deep concern toward the people of India with real ethics, principles and other personal factors that supersedes the usual double standards of politics. Mr. Modi's simple and common man's lifestyle is the proof in the pudding. He is selfless and that's what makes him stand out on all fronts in comparison to today's politicos of India. I truly wish him all the very best from the bottom of my heart. It's time that India moves out of the 'shame shackle' that we have been labeled by the world at large, in terms of womens' dignity, CORRUPTION, rapes and criminals elected as politicians. Mr. Modi, India needs you now or it will be never for India to be a country that it was before the advent of the Moghuls. more
May 04
well detailed and NM shall implement. Transparency and details shall be given to debates and then resolutions, laws, amendments, Acts, Ordinances ................................... passed. more
May 04
