comment on dismissing a case after 15 years for technical reason.
i was surprised to read a news item where the delhi court dismissed as case of interference in discharging of duty by govt servant. in particulars case it was misbehaving in a court of inquiry. and it took 15 years to dismiss it because the presiding officer has not filed the complaint but the police who were present filed the case suo moto. if these technical issues are taken for dismissing a case after such a long period where offence has taken place. does it not give courage to powerful to go scott free of their crimes. I hope this is not the independence of judiciary supported and protected by honourable cheif justice of india. more
Viewed by 142
View all 14 comments Below 14 comments
dont you think supreme courts judgement in coalgate is more appropriate than on 2g scam is it because of change of govt. in the case of coalgate they imposed penalty even while cancelling the licence but in case of 2g it did not impose penalty nor disgorged enrichment by the parties who sold the company at hefty premium after getting the licence. and the then minister even said that they will compensate the telecom companies and might have already passed on the same. but in coal gate present govt pleaded to continue the licences of those who have already invested and started work with a penalty. but court imposed a penalty but did not continue the licence. dont you feel the standards applied are different in the two cases. is it the non negotiable independence of judiciary worked. does it not appear the judgement s today are not justice done but the opinion of the judge on the arguments placed before him. that is why every one feels denied justice and legal battle continues. it took 18 years for the jayalalitha case. chidambarams election petition still languishing. and national herald case is being allowed to be appealed at the notice time itself and being adjourned on technical issues. that is why pending cases increase at every court. court also do not monitor implementation of its judgement by all who are effected. every one has to approach the court separately to implement the judgement to his case. this is happening mostly in service cases of banks, because banks wait for superior court iba to give a ruling. cant the supreme court in its judgment direct the iba itself to implement it and inform action taken within stipulated time. even though there are umpteen judgement s about gratuity and pension in banking industry banks and iba are harassing the officers and employees by not adhering to the settled judgemnts. more
Oct 01
RAMNIWAS GOELJEE you may not believe i have sent my representation to every authority yo imagine in india but everywhere they are more concerned with protecting themselves. more
Sep 15
Dayananda Kamath Jee, You may approach the Hon'ble President of India and the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India to bring all these facts to their knowledge for redress of the problem. more
Sep 14
ramakrishana ji now they have made you to move a court where the cheque is issued with a recent ruling. so they are helping the fraudsters to harass the innocent. so now you have to see where the cheque is issued and insist for cheque drawn in your place of residense. section 138 in negotiable instruments was inserted to make the cheque more secure as means of payment. but nbfcs and bankers and moneylenders misused the facility and are just taking post dated cheques and no other documents. that is why there are more number of cases under this. it is abuse of legal process.. more
Aug 25
rajesh kumarji what guarantee is there same thing will not happen to me in supreme court also. I have spent lot of money in high court. and if the high court has taken ha acted judiciously, rajstan govt would have recovered crores in sales tax on gold imports. Indian govt could have earned crores of rupees in penalty for violating fema and import export policy guidelines under third party gold imports. and a host of corrupt bankers, officers in rbi, nominated agencies and ministry of finance. ministry of corporate affairs would have been taken rid off. that is why i complained to chief justice of karnataka with a copy to chief justice of india. which has a precedence of a simple post card by an aggrieved party leading to an historic judgement on constitutional right in the past. but todays judiciary is more concerned with their independence. and no action so far. more
Aug 25
