Consultation on filing PIL - SECURING UNCLAIMED AND UN-REFUNDED MONEY OF UNIDENTIFIABLE CONSUMERS
“Competition is the main stay of the free market. Search for ‘Imperfections’ and ‘Failures’ in the market is the main stay of Consumer Protection Movement,”
of which you are the Masters.” ………G. C. Mathur
“Good Governance of Democracy is the assurance of a Perfect Market where consumers are the whistleblowers and protectors of their Rights that need to be kept out of influences of the politicians, bhakt bureaucrats and judicial benches.” …………G. C. Mathur
It is in connection with a matter that has affected millions of un-identifiable fellow consumers whose trillions of rupees are lying unclaimed and un-refunded over the decades in some cases with various public and private sector bodies that cannot be utilized and or transferred to any Fund or Account without firm consent of consumers, and, I believe, you must be aware of the same but could not take effective steps for reasons best known to you.
02. The estimated collected value of the amount, I believe, is running into several trillions. I am quoting hereunder some of the confirmed figures of the value:
(i) Reserve Bank of India (RBI) ... Rs.12,705.73 Cr as on Jun’17.
(ii) National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority
(NPPA) ... Rs.2,94,552.00 Cr - Jan ’15
(iii) Department of Posts (DoP) ... Rs.752.44 Cr as on Mar ’11.
(iv) Insurance Regulator & Dev Authority(IRDA) ... Rs.1.5 trillion approx
(v) IRDAI Order SBI Life Insurance to refund
amount collected in excess commission. ... Rs.275.29 crore
03. For your information I have categorized the type of money that has remained unclaimed and un-refunded that I, on behalf of unidentifiable fellow consumers, demand from the authorities to place in a consolidated manner in the Consumer Welfare Fund under Consumer Protection Act 1986 with due amendments to the relevant legislations. Some of the categories of money claimed for refund have been identified as follows:
(i) “Simple Deposits” of consumers of different services e.g., fixed deposits, savings bank accounts, current bank accounts, post office deposits, Government Treasuries (At the Centre and States), insurance, Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, government bonds, deposits with companies/corporate houses, , et al, that could be termed as “Unclaimed Deposits”;
(ii) “Assessed As Undue S-Tax Charge” collected from consumers by the retail market in the name of taxes – excise, levies, octroi, sales tax/VAT, etc. – but not refunded to consumers, after assessment by the States’/UTs’ taxation authorities.
(iii) “Unfair Trade Practice Detected By Consumers” and reported to the adjudicating authority as a complaint but is dismissed as unacceptable. Example: the chemists’ trade in India charging in the name of Local Taxes Extra but not mention in the Cash Memos because it was chargeable at the First Point of Sales – error of judgment – consumers lost thousands of crores over a time;
(iv) “Un-Ethical Charge”, as Unfair Trade Practice, assessed and recovered by the Regulatory Bodies e.g. IRDA, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority of India (NPPA), Competition Commission of India (CCI) in the name of “Cartelisation”, TRAI, Director General Civil Aviation (DGCA), and others, which is the unidentifiable consumers’ money saved in the hands of Regulators but not paid back to the unidentifiable consumers in the CWF.
(v) “Un-Ethical Self-Aggrandisement” by Regulators through transfer of excess money to their Consumer Education and Awareness Funds. Example: TRAI, IRDA, RBI, NPPA, et al. RBI has transferred the funds to pay for the office expenditure of Banking Ombudsmen which were earlier provided for in the Scheme’s budget meant for the purpose.
(vi) “Unethical Transfer of Retail-Investors’ Unclaimed and Unpaid Amounts” versus the Investor Education and Protection Fund set up under the Companies Act in 1999. It is necessary to understand the difference between deposits, price over-charge, undue charge of sales tax, etc. and ‘investment money’ which a consumer (retail investor) invests in speculative market – equity market that is full of risks with the intention of giving financial boost or incentive to producers of goods and services that require additional capital. This will be taken up separately at another occasion.
(vii) “Manipulation of Refund of 4%(CVD) Additional Duty of Customs in terms of Notification No. 102/2007-Customs dated 14.09.2001” by simplifying procedure for sanction of refund of 4% SAD in case of ACP importers vide Circular No. 18/2010-Customs dated 8th July, 2010). The Circular provides for refund that shall be sanctioned in full, on preliminary scrutiny of the documents and certificate of statutory auditor/Chartered Accountant, for correlating the payment of ST/VAT on the imported goods with the invoices of sale and also to the effect that the burden of 4% CVD has not been passed on by the importer to the buyer.
(a) At times the words, “Do we need Regulator for Unclaimed Deposits?”, of M G Warrier a freelancer based in Thiruvananthapuram carried in Moneylife Report dated 04.05.2013 come knocking to the mind. He writes, “Though any move to create awareness is laudable, the sourcing of funds from unclaimed deposits for the purpose, the proposal to appropriate idle funds irrespective of their origin or ownership, is unethical.” While fully agreeing, the emphasis is on bad governance of the Indian Democracy that is abusing the rights of consumers, with utter failure of the institutions of CAG, the chartered accountants and the auditors well positioned by the authorities.
(viii) “The Balances in the Assessed Income Tax Accounts of Unidentifiable Individuals. The Income Tax Departments at the Centre and the States have yet to be approached for confirming the unclaimed balances lying with them for more than 5 years.
04. You will appreciate that the amount is quite substantial and cannot be left to the mercy of bad governance that is responsible for the initial policy and procedural lapses at all levels. My objective is, therefore, just to first secure the money in our hands and then work for their utilization in philanthropic and charitable manner as unidentifiable consumers to whom this money belongs, for the benefit of fellow consumers only that are poor, illiterate, and voiceless besides those in the lower and middle income category largely. Short of time and space, I will put forth the instances before the judiciary at the appropriate time.
05. Coming to the closing of this Consultancy Paper I would like to make it very clear the following:
i) That I have nothing to gain personally, financially or otherwise;
ii) That I have no conflict with the political leadership in power or out of power, or, political parties of any ideology, or, any religious/caste bigotry;
iii) That I have no conflict with the bureaucrats or bureaucracy or administrative machinery except that I seek good governance;
iv) That the aims and objects are being worked out and the same will be placed before a group of fellow consumers, activist organizations that will commit to the cause - SECURE CONSUMERS PERSONAL MONEY AND WORK FOR ITS UTILISATION IN PHILANTHROPIC AND CHARTITABLE MANNER; and,
vi) That my objects include formation of a TRUST (Rashtriya Upbhokta Dharam Khata, another name proposed for CWF) to be managed by UPBHOKTA DHARAM KHATA MANAGEMENT TRUST/Niyas (propose to name “Upbhokta Dharam Khata Prabandhana Nyas) that will all be controlled and directed by consumer protection council at the national, state and district levels (propose to name as Kendriya/State/District Upbhokta Sangrakshan Parishad“) under Consumer Protection Act without any political or bureaucratic nominations as members, with due amendments of relevant legislations. The details will be worked later when the time comes.
06. It is also to inform you that notices have since been issued to the concerned Departments of the Govt of India and State Governments, some of whom have just acknowledge receipt while one or two have just responded. It may also be mentioned that this document is not meant for the media and publilcity, and is, thus, addressed to you as a consumer holding an important position in the society.The matter is now in the hands of a very senior advocate for finalizing the contents of the PIL. I would expect your unbiased online response to the above consultation process with certain commitments latest by 17 March 2018; particularly you’re agreeing to stand by me in the court whenever needed.
Your firm views, comments, and support are sought from participants in all the Circles of LocalCircles.
Thanks with regards,
G. C. Mathur
M: 9910338312. Email: gcmbinty@yahoo.com more
My Salute to you. Thanks for bringing out another fact of investors money lying in the Government coffers, seized by the Law enforcement agencies, neither returned to the rightful claimants nor utilized for public/consumer welfare purposes. Colnel sir I am of the opinion that the Investors who have invested their money, have the first right over all the money/ assests seized by the authorities, then comes the public sector banks and general public and consumers. This has been going on for the last 70 years since our independence. The present Central Government under the able leadership of PM Modiji is trying to bring in change in the corrupt system that has been rotting and being rotten by the earstwhile successive congress Governments. I still believe that we as consumers come together and make a presentation to PM Modiji along with Finance Minister Arun Jaitelyji, then something can be worked out.
Your valuable opinion would be highly appreciated. Going through the court route will be extremely time consuming and cumbersome.
Regards
Sandeep Sheregar
Advocate High Court
Mumbai more