Fate of ideas & suggestions submitted to P.M,
Prime Minister’s office forwarded the report to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). I received what looks like an indifferent reply from ICAR saying that points mentioned in the report have already been taken care. This is not true. If what is needed to be done has already been done, then Indian sugar industry would not be in the mess that it is today.
Based on extensive primary survey , a group of professionals conducted detailed study on water management in India and suggested several measures to overcome the present grim scenario. I sent the entire report in the form of CD to the Prime Minister. Surprisingly, I got a reply from the government treating it as a grievance petition and stating that I have not expressed any grievance in the report. What can I do with this reply?
I got another letter from the Central government department ( grievance cell) giving some information about Karim Nagar district , which I have not sought. Obviously, this letter is meant for someone else but addressed to me by name.
Before putting great efforts to investigate several problems facing the country and provide the suggestions to the Prime Minister , it appears that one should think it twice.
I have lot of respect for Mr. Modi but he has a weak and very indifferent government machinery with him. Obviously, the Prime Minister should gather courage to tune the government machinery which call for sacking the inefficient and indifferent officials. This is a primary requisite .
N.S.Venkataraman
Director
Nandini Consultancy Centre
www.nandinichemical.com more