Ignoring courts who is responsible
The Judges themselves are responsible for such a situations. Today's judgements are not delivery of justice. It is the personal opinion of the judge on the arguments he has chosen from those placed before him. Than considering all the facts before him and then deciding who is at fault and what is the punishment. Which should deter others from doing the same offence. The Law has given them vast powers to use for public good. But it is being used to protect and promote culprits. The principle that an innocent should not be punished is used to protect guilty.
If the judiciary has done proper justice there will not be appeals. Today the way judgements are delivered makes every one feel cheated and tries to have his way as the next judge can be purchased.
I was surprised to know from a litigant that in CBI courts also there is a scheme where you can purchase favourable orders and the given money will be returned if the order is not in your favour.
Can you imagine a Karnataka High court judge orders in a victimization of an officer by the executives whose irregularities where brought out by the officer as part of his official duty was removed by the executives misusing their executive powers, since the officer is stickler for rules he may be given compulsory retirement. Only change of words with same effect.
Such judgements can be given only by incompetent, biased and corrupt judge only. more