Is something wrong with Justice Delivery System?

Most important aspect is that every criminal offence must be decided within 3 months and no criminal must not remain outside to commit more and more crimes without any fear of law. Delay in justice is being abused by the professional criminals. Simultaneously it is also very important that no innocent person must remain in jail for even a single day. more

Headline in Times of India HC increases rapist’s jail term from the original 3 yrs to 7 yrs. MUMBAI: More than 28 years after a man from south Mumbai was accused of raping an “adolescent” domestic help and 14 years after the trial court delivered a guilty verdict. As the man was out on bail, the HC said his bail bond stood cancelled and directed him earlier this month to surrender by January 4. It took 14 years for trial court to deliver guilty verdict and another 14 years for High Court to pass an order. In the mean time rapist was out on bail for 28 years. Now he will approach Supreme Court and may be it will take another 14 years for delivery of justice to rape victim. This may be the reason why rapes are taking place every day as there is no fear of Law. This lacuna in justice delivery system needs to be corrected by suitable amendment to Criminal Procedure Code. Some suggestions are: 1. Police to be sensitized to file FIR in rape cases without any delay. 2. Rape should be made Non-bailable crime. 3. Time limits to be fixed for investigation (4 weeks), Trial Court (2 weeks), High Court (2 weeks) and Supreme Court (4 weeks). 4. If death sentence awarded then time limit of two weeks for mercy appeal to President. 5. No review Petition to be allowed in Supreme Court. 6. Execution of criminal after rejection of mercy petition in One Week.

Helpful Surakshit Bharat Dec 26

Viewed by 22

Csn Sarma

Fact is that illfull Rulers side-tracked concept of Justice since 1963 as is evident from SC Judgements AIR 1963/73 SC 649 , AIR 1979 SC 1369 , AIR 1983 SC 130 , AIR 1983 SC 624 , (1984) SCC 654 , AIR 1985 SC 1495 , (1987) 4 SCC 609 , AIR 1992 SC 1858 , (1994) SCC 243 , (1995) 3 SCC 635 , (1996) 4 SCC 212 etc . Strict Reformatory Regulations are FAST NEEDED REVIEWING Law Commission , Bar Council and Judiciary . Law Graduates are requested to study take Interest and befit joining and participating positively in NLFNP Circle more

Dec 31

Dr. Ajay Jain (Expert)

Absolutely urgently needed implementation more

Dec 27

Csn Sarma

- Judiciary, Bar Council of India, Indian Law Commission must be held Responsible for prompt Enforcement of IPC as well as adhering to the Legal Recognition "Justice Delayed is Justice Denied* - THESE 3 BODIES OF JUSTICE must also Carry the SC Conclusions on SPEEDY TRIAL Honouring Supreme Court . - These 3 National Law Wings/Limbs Shall also be held Responsible for REVISION OF VOLUME OF PUNISHMENTS IF IPC FOR EVERY 5 YEARS . * These 3 issues are the Basics and Fundamental Requirements of Any Jury , Jurisprudence and Justice . * Honourable President and CJI of India to ORDER FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW OF THESE ABOVE 3 ISSUES since this itself is the Fundamental Concept Objective and Duty of ANY TYPE OF CONSTITUTION / RULE / JUDICIARY . more

Dec 27