JUDICIERY V/s EXECUTIVE - Constitutional REMEDIES

WE , THE SENIOR CITIZENS OF INDIA, NEED TO COME FORWARD WITH ALL VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS TO MAKE BOTH EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIARY WORK IN TANDEM AND NOT AGAINST EACH OTHER. 1)ORDINARY CITIZENS EMPLOY AN ADVOCATE BECAUSE THEY HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAWS IN THE STATUTES , CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, ETC. BUT THE JUDICIARY UNDER THE BRITISH REGIME HAD ONLY CONTEMPT FOR THE ORDINARY INDIANS . THE JUDGE ALWAYS DECLARED "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE !! HANG HIM ON THE GALLOWS !!"" THE SITUATION REMAINS THE SAME EVEN AFTER GETTING INDEPENDENCE ABOUT 7 DECADES AGO !! WE DON'T NEED JUDGES TO IMITATE THE BRITISH COLONIAL RULE THROUGH THE JUDICIARY. "EDUCATE YOUR MASTERS " THIS IS WHAT ANY DEMOCRATIC GOVT. SHOULD DO FIRST OF ALL. THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE TILL DATE. EVEN THE SUBJECT OF "CIVICS" IS NOT BEING TAUGHT !! WE ARE TOLD BY NONE OTHER THAN AN HONOURABLE C.J.I. THAT ABOUT 75 % OF THE ADVOCATES AND JUDGES ARE CORRUPTED. SO WHAT IS THE SOLUTION TO THIS SITUATION ?? WHY SHOULD THE GOVT. OF INDIA ALLOW THE POOR CITIZENS TO BE EXPLOITED BY THE "MEN AND WOMEN IN BLACK" ?? 2)THE LEGAL PROFESSION WAS ONCE KNOWN AS A NOBLE PROFESSION . ONLY THOSE WHO HAD AN ARISTOCRATIC BACKGROUND WERE PREFERRED , NOT THOSE WHO WERE INFLUENCED BY ALL KINDS OF POLITICAL PARTIES FOR THEIR OWN NEFARIOUS PURPOSES. 3)THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO "WATCH DOG" TO WATCH THE PROGRESS OF EACH CASE AND TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO ALL LITIGANTS. BY CAREFULLY MONITORING THE FILING OF CASES PROPERLY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES, A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF DELAY AND DISMISSAL OF CASES CAN BE AVGOIDED, AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGES. 4)AT PRESENT "FRAUD" ADVOCATES COOK UP SOME CASE TO EXPLOIT THE IGNORANT LITIGANTS !! THUS HE IS FORCED TO SPEND ALL HIS HARD EARNED SAVINGS ON LITIGATION AND FINALLY LOSES THE CASE TO THE DEFENDANT HAVING MORE FINANCIAL AND LEGAL RESOURCES TO ILLEGALLY "PURCHASE" THE PLAINTIFF'S ADVOCATE. NO WONDER MORE AND MORE CITIZENS DEPEND ON "QUOTATION GANGS" TO GET INSTANT JUSTICE !! more  

आत्म निरीक्षण की आशा न्यायपालिका से तो क्या किसी से भी नहीं की जा सकती है, और आलोचना सुनने की किसी को आदत नहीं रही, सुधार की अपेक्षा कैसे करे, हर कोई स्वयं को अँग्रेज़ो के जमाने का जेलर समझ रहा है, यानि सबसे बुद्धिमान अब बताये रास्ता कौन सुझाये, परिवर्तन समय की मांग है, अहं को छोड़ सामंजस्य से सुधार की प्रक्रिया का प्रारम्भ करना होगा, बुद्धी सही काम करे परम शक्ति से प्रार्थना है, साभार. more  

दिक्कत यही है की लोकतन्त्र के चारो स्तम्भ आम आदमी की आवाज़ को सुनना ही नहीं चाहते है और न्यायपालिका तो अपने अहम मे किसी को सुनना नहीं चाहते है । अजीब बिडम्बना है की हर रोज़ दूसरों को सुधरने की नसीहत देने वाले न्यायपालिका खुद सुधरने को तैयार नहीं है और इसी लिए ब्रिटिश काल से चली आ रही प्रणाली पर ही उच्चतम न्यायालाय क्यूँ ज़िद कर रहा है more  

Lack of transparency, lack of reasons for interim orders are the two reasons why why suffer in this country. I suffered as CG employee for 25 years in every court of this country. I got 3 promotions in a single day with huge arrears without working in higher posts. The responsible executives from Indian Audit Department are never punished. more  

thank you sir, On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 4:47 PM, NAVIN CHAND GUPTA < support@localcirclesmail.com> wrote: > more