Law in India
I agree with most of the observations made by Prakash Yadav Ji. Any one who has been a litigant and was foolish like me to think that Justice is delivered at least in the Supreme Court, knows from experience, that orders given or judgements passed do not have anything to do with laws. The judges know , they can't be questioned. They even base judgements on documents, they have not seen. Happened in the case for my Sector. Several letters to the Registrar,to give us the document. no reply.
Finally, an application in the legal form to give us a copy of the document on which the order was passed. Reply- the document was not available with the Registry.
What can you say about our Judicial system.
You cannot question such corrupt judges, the whole system stinks. more
Finally, an application in the legal form to give us a copy of the document on which the order was passed. Reply- the document was not available with the Registry.
What can you say about our Judicial system.
You cannot question such corrupt judges, the whole system stinks. more
Viewed by 716
View all 58 comments Below 58 comments
You cannot ignore the role of the Opposition in destroying the governance of the three pillars of the Indian democracy. Just do some research on what was the Opposition doing when sitting in opposition or when the Opposition came to power for short times. Please, do not blame the Congress alone. I am an unbiased person and would like to understand the role these political parties in opposition to each other are doing. more
Aug 28
1. There is to be a way to come out from the Caste and Communities ill-full system practice that was staged as anti national since they create jealousy, antipathy and even rivalry.
2. There is the basic necessity for maintenance of Fraternity removing Caste and Religious apportionment from Government side in Rule of the Country.
3. There is to be a follow of honouring Judiciary and Judicial Orders and many Supreme Court Judgments had been neglected by the Congress and its supporting Allies since 60s.
4. There is the absolute necessity to maintain Knowledge and Merit even in the reserved Category Quota as also confined and declared by S.C. to improve economic status atleast in educated individuals either with Job or, Self Employment through various means of merchandise .
5. There is fundamental necessity to keep away the misuse of Lands held against the Land Ceiling Acts the failure of which increased in continued protests/revolts by Communists and given raise of increase in Maoism in the Country.
6. All these 5 sorts of ills in the Governance since 1951 January, in furtherance of Atalji' s call in general resulted even break of Congress into Congress [i] , [o], [s], [j], [Urs] and later even separation with new names AS , JP, LD, RLD, JLD, JD, JDU, RJD, BJD, SP, BSP, and in furtherance, DMK, AIADMK, ;;; NCP, TMC, AITMC, YSRCP etc., etc.,
But Still, many of these for one Electoral Period Join into Alliance == and , grossly oppose in another Electoral Period .
All these issues added with multiple increase of many more parties even Regionally set , are JUST, JUST AND JUST FOR THE CAUSES OF THE ABOVE 5 only .
7. It is the Piety , though Indian Union has 7 National Parties and multiple 10s of Regional parties , not even a Single State of the whole Union has achieved the concept of Policy of Rule in the Country though set under a special Part and the mandates of which were guaranteed in the Preamble of the Constitution.
8. Above all , we have all joined together, sharing together, and , working together just and only for the achievement of good governance through people's participation and, with vested responsibility suggesting for the requisite Changes in Systems set, Rule Carried, with due interest to bring in Reforms in many Issues as had been ever being shared in our Mother Circle . Many also suggested that bringing in awareness in the People alone is the remedy to get good governance as well as fulfill the issue of Transformation aimed. more
2. There is the basic necessity for maintenance of Fraternity removing Caste and Religious apportionment from Government side in Rule of the Country.
3. There is to be a follow of honouring Judiciary and Judicial Orders and many Supreme Court Judgments had been neglected by the Congress and its supporting Allies since 60s.
4. There is the absolute necessity to maintain Knowledge and Merit even in the reserved Category Quota as also confined and declared by S.C. to improve economic status atleast in educated individuals either with Job or, Self Employment through various means of merchandise .
5. There is fundamental necessity to keep away the misuse of Lands held against the Land Ceiling Acts the failure of which increased in continued protests/revolts by Communists and given raise of increase in Maoism in the Country.
6. All these 5 sorts of ills in the Governance since 1951 January, in furtherance of Atalji' s call in general resulted even break of Congress into Congress [i] , [o], [s], [j], [Urs] and later even separation with new names AS , JP, LD, RLD, JLD, JD, JDU, RJD, BJD, SP, BSP, and in furtherance, DMK, AIADMK, ;;; NCP, TMC, AITMC, YSRCP etc., etc.,
But Still, many of these for one Electoral Period Join into Alliance == and , grossly oppose in another Electoral Period .
All these issues added with multiple increase of many more parties even Regionally set , are JUST, JUST AND JUST FOR THE CAUSES OF THE ABOVE 5 only .
7. It is the Piety , though Indian Union has 7 National Parties and multiple 10s of Regional parties , not even a Single State of the whole Union has achieved the concept of Policy of Rule in the Country though set under a special Part and the mandates of which were guaranteed in the Preamble of the Constitution.
8. Above all , we have all joined together, sharing together, and , working together just and only for the achievement of good governance through people's participation and, with vested responsibility suggesting for the requisite Changes in Systems set, Rule Carried, with due interest to bring in Reforms in many Issues as had been ever being shared in our Mother Circle . Many also suggested that bringing in awareness in the People alone is the remedy to get good governance as well as fulfill the issue of Transformation aimed. more
Aug 28
We must understand the objective of the two particular political organisation: while one wanted to rule over the masses (The BJP a known party of the business community with back up from RSS) and the other (The Congress with a back up massive public support) had the agenda of governance of democracy. I can never forget the words of Atalji, 'agar hame sattah nahin milli, to him isko aapke qabil bhi nahin chhodenge.' , the most damaging guidelines for the RSS workers. In 1971 after the India-Pakistan war, Atal ji openly asked the RSS cadre 'If you want to take over the power, then intrude into the Congress party and break it from within.' Well friends, I am a Hindu and a very proud Hindu but not a fanatic. Now assess. more
Aug 28
Atalji of BJP in Parliament , Chandrababu Naidu of TDP in Assembly ever stands as Models of Opposition Leaders . There were such many also . The inevitable path of criticizing to avoid Ruling Party's Dev./Welfare Programs/ Bills has become ever successful since a Minus of Ruling Party sets Double Plus to Opposite Party . As Sri Vajpayee rightly Criticized, Politics aught to be followed in its true sense of Political Science and not leading down to Politics . more
Aug 28
Sri Srinivas is Correct. The willful neglect of Congress and allies is the result of present status of JUSTICE requiring Unite Civil Protest. Ref: 1] {1987} 4 SCC 609 : S.C. laid down the following guidelines for the exercise of the right under Article 32 :- { MOST IMPORTANT } 1.The Scope of Art. 226 is wider than Art.32 . The parties first seek relief in the High Court and should come to the Supreme Court in appeal only . 2. Hearing of the case at the level of High Court is more convenient to the parties. It saves lot of time. 3. The High Court has its own tradition. They have eminent Judges, whose capacity should be utilised. 4. Every High Court has a good Bar. There eminent lawyers with wide experience, handle different kind of cases. They know history of every legislation in their State. 5. The Supreme Court has no time to decide cases pending before it for the last 10 to 15 years. With the present strength of Judges and will take more than 15 years to dispose of all pending cases . 6. If the cases are filed in the High Court the task of Supreme Court acting as an original court which is a time consuming can be avoided . 7. If cases which may be filed in the High Court are filed in this Court it would affect the initiative of the High Courts . We should preserve the dignity, majesty and efficiency of the High Courts. The taking over by this Court of the work of High Court may undermine the capacity and efficiency of the High Court and should be avoided. 8. The time saved by this Court by not entertaining the cases which may be filed before the High Courts can be utilised to dispose of old matters in which parties are crying for relief . 2- AIR 1987 SC 1087 “ 1. The Court held that the poor in India can seek enforcement of their fundamental rights from the Supreme Court by writing a letter to ay Judge .” Further , “ 2. The Court also held that under Art. 32 it has power to grant remedial relief which includes the power to grant compensation in appropriate cases where the fundamental rights of the poor and disadvantage persons are violated . “ 3. The Court held that the Court can appoint socio-legal commissions or devise any procedure and forge any tools it deems appropriate for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the poor “ . 3- {1994} 1 SCC 243 “ If loss or injury is caused to a citizen by the arbitrary actions of State employees the State is liable to pay compensation to him . Public authorities who are entrusted with statutory function cannot act negligently . UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION SOVEREIGNTY IS VESTED IN THE PEOPLE. Every limb of the Constitutional machinery is obliged to be people oriented . .....” 4. AIR 1963 SC 649 ; AIR 1985 SC 1495 on unjustified carry of Reservations == [1995] 3 SCC 635 on Uniform Civil Code == [1985] 3 SCC 545 on Qualifications, Rt. to work etc == AIR 1979 SC 1369 on Speedy Trial ;;;;; are the issues to ever refer to S.C. ; HCs. and demand implementation , preferring AIR 1983 SC 624 in which S.C. notified that Supreme Court is Responsible to serve Constitutional Provisions to the people . more
Aug 28
Mr N. Bageshwar is right to suggest that with present system of reservation backwardness would increase. While the backwards would be what they are. forwards would be pulled down to back wordnrss. more
Aug 27
If robots could be judged they can be Doctors, Engineers etc. But they should not be Politicians m more
Aug 25
As long as we do not have an agitation as civil outcry with physical demonstrations no change can be brought in India. more
Aug 25
Correct. The willful neglect of Congress and allies is the result of present status of JUSTICE . Ref: 1] {1987} 4 SCC 609 : S.C. laid down the following guidelines for the exercise of the right under Article 32 :- { MOST IMPORTANT }
1.The Scope of Art. 226 is wider than Art.32 . The parties first seek relief in the High Court and should come to the Supreme Court in appeal only .
2. Hearing of the case at the level of High Court is more convenient to the parties. It saves lot of time.
3. The High Court has its own tradition. They have eminent Judges, whose capacity should be utilised.
4. Every High Court has a good Bar. There eminent lawyers with wide experience, handle different kind of cases. They know history of every legislation in their State.
5. The Supreme Court has no time to decide cases pending before it for the last 10 to 15 years. With the present strength of Judges and will take more than 15 years to dispose of all pending cases .
6. If the cases are filed in the High Court the task of Supreme Court acting as an original court which is a time consuming can be avoided .
7. If cases which may be filed in the High Court are filed in this Court it would affect the initiative of the High Courts . We should preserve the dignity, majesty and efficiency of the High Courts. The taking over by this Court of the work of High Court may undermine the capacity and efficiency of the High Court and should be avoided.
8. The time saved by this Court by not entertaining the cases which may be filed before the High Courts can be utilised to dispose of old matters in which parties are crying for relief .
2- AIR 1987 SC 1087 “ 1. The Court held that the poor in India can seek enforcement of their fundamental rights from the Supreme Court by writing a letter to ay Judge .” Further , “ 2. The Court also held that under Art. 32 it has power to grant remedial relief which includes the power to grant compensation in appropriate cases where the fundamental rights of the poor and disadvantage persons are violated . “ 3. The Court held that the Court can appoint socio-legal commissions or devise any procedure and forge any tools it deems appropriate for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the poor “ .
3- {1994} 1 SCC 243 “ If loss or injury is caused to a citizen by the arbitrary actions of State employees the State is liable to pay compensation to him . Public authorities who are entrusted with statutory function cannot act negligently . UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION SOVEREIGNTY IS VESTED IN THE PEOPLE. Every limb of the Constitutional machinery is obliged to be people oriented . .....”
4. AIR 1963 SC 649 ; AIR 1985 SC 1495 on unjustified carry of Reservations == [1995] 3 SCC 635 on Uniform Civil Code == [1985] 3 SCC 545 on Qualifications, Rt. to work etc == AIR 1979 SC 1369 on Speedy Trial ;;;;; are the issues to ever refer to S.C. ; HCs. and demand implementation , preferring AIR 1983 SC 624 in which S.C. notified that Supreme Court is Responsible to serve Constitutional Provisions to the people . more
1.The Scope of Art. 226 is wider than Art.32 . The parties first seek relief in the High Court and should come to the Supreme Court in appeal only .
2. Hearing of the case at the level of High Court is more convenient to the parties. It saves lot of time.
3. The High Court has its own tradition. They have eminent Judges, whose capacity should be utilised.
4. Every High Court has a good Bar. There eminent lawyers with wide experience, handle different kind of cases. They know history of every legislation in their State.
5. The Supreme Court has no time to decide cases pending before it for the last 10 to 15 years. With the present strength of Judges and will take more than 15 years to dispose of all pending cases .
6. If the cases are filed in the High Court the task of Supreme Court acting as an original court which is a time consuming can be avoided .
7. If cases which may be filed in the High Court are filed in this Court it would affect the initiative of the High Courts . We should preserve the dignity, majesty and efficiency of the High Courts. The taking over by this Court of the work of High Court may undermine the capacity and efficiency of the High Court and should be avoided.
8. The time saved by this Court by not entertaining the cases which may be filed before the High Courts can be utilised to dispose of old matters in which parties are crying for relief .
2- AIR 1987 SC 1087 “ 1. The Court held that the poor in India can seek enforcement of their fundamental rights from the Supreme Court by writing a letter to ay Judge .” Further , “ 2. The Court also held that under Art. 32 it has power to grant remedial relief which includes the power to grant compensation in appropriate cases where the fundamental rights of the poor and disadvantage persons are violated . “ 3. The Court held that the Court can appoint socio-legal commissions or devise any procedure and forge any tools it deems appropriate for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the poor “ .
3- {1994} 1 SCC 243 “ If loss or injury is caused to a citizen by the arbitrary actions of State employees the State is liable to pay compensation to him . Public authorities who are entrusted with statutory function cannot act negligently . UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION SOVEREIGNTY IS VESTED IN THE PEOPLE. Every limb of the Constitutional machinery is obliged to be people oriented . .....”
4. AIR 1963 SC 649 ; AIR 1985 SC 1495 on unjustified carry of Reservations == [1995] 3 SCC 635 on Uniform Civil Code == [1985] 3 SCC 545 on Qualifications, Rt. to work etc == AIR 1979 SC 1369 on Speedy Trial ;;;;; are the issues to ever refer to S.C. ; HCs. and demand implementation , preferring AIR 1983 SC 624 in which S.C. notified that Supreme Court is Responsible to serve Constitutional Provisions to the people . more
Aug 28
very true Mr Srinivas. A common man generally comes out from the court with a words on his/her lips ' Rules are for fools'. Because he can not even think of justice even from the HC/SC. more
Aug 28
