Odd Enough! What Even?
Oddly enough, it is claimed that Delhiites are happy with odd-even scheme. Yes, here is the complete list of people with the reason of their happiness:
- Car owners, who have multiple cars (with odd and even numbers) are not affected by this order. Rather, they will face less congestion, so HAPPY
- Two wheeler owners, who can now enjoy still better zigzagging on Delhi roads. HAPPY
- Lady drivers (the category not covered under odd-even) would feel more comfortable to drive on less crowded streets. HAPPY
- Auto rickshaw and cab drivers get business boost up and increase in income. HAPPY
- The low income group, who do not own cars, experience less congested roads for walking, cycling, road crossing… HAPPY
- CNG car owners face less congested roads, since there is no other difference as far as they are concerned. HAPPY
See, in all these cases, pollution control is NOT the issue. In fact, decrease in pollution levels was never conclusively proved, yet…
OK, now, who are left?
- Middle income group / Senior citizens / people who are basically field workers like sales people or cash collection agents – the people, who are not covered in any of the above-mentioned categories and they own only one petrol / diesel car.
Oh, come on! That is too small a group! In any case, they are too insignificant to make a difference (as far as vote bank is concerned!)
On the hindsight EVEN IF the pollution levels come down during the experimental fortnight, there is a need to see whether it is significant, whether there are other more polluting factors that need to be tackled and whether the gains (if any and whatever) can be sustained over a period of time. Yes, such an exercise will throw up challenges and need to make big efforts. Surely, too tall an order as compared to cheap gimmicks to gain quick popularity and electoral gains.
And who said that this fortnightly exercise should be carried out every month? Isn’t it ridiculous? How can one justify half good and half bad month… month after month? But, yes, the focus is very clear – to repeat – “quick popularity and electoral gains.” more