Politicising Crimes, Diluting Facts of Crimes must be CURBED

Black Money, Poverty leading to Multiple ills. To be Curbed Linking Aadhar to All , Demonetising 2000 and 500 , Limiting Cash Trans to below Rs2,000 ALL THESE 3; ISSUES ARE MUST TO CONTROL Black Money Generations . Indian Judiciary and Executive to implement to Save People and Nation. People are Striving for Adequate Livelihood and Education SINCE 2 and 1/2 Decades . more  

A* Clause [1] of Article 38 was included for securing social State in which justice , social , economic and political shall inform all the institutions of the national life – through sec. 9 of 44th Amendment Act – 1978 . Section 9 also included : minimise the inequalities in income and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status , facilities and opportunities in Clause [2] of Article 38 . B* SC Clarified that the Directive Principles are mandate to the State to eradicate poverty – AIR 1992 SC 1858 C* AIR 1984 SC 803 S.C. held that “ Article 32 does not merely confer power on the Court to issue a direction, order or writ for the enforcement of the fundamental rights but it also lays a constitutional obligation on this Court to protect the fundamental rights of the people and for that purpose this Court has all incidental an ancillary powers including to forge new remedies and fashion new strategies designed to enforce fundamental rights. It is in realisation of this constitutional obligation that this Court has innovated new methods and strategies particularly for enforcing the fundamental rights of the poor and disadvantaged who are denied their human rights and to whom freedom and liberty have no meaning . “ D* AIR 1987 SC 1087 “ 1. The Court held that the poor in India can seek enforcement of their fundamental rights from the Supreme Court by writing a letter to ay Judge .” Further , “ 2. The Court also held that under Art. 32 it has power to grant remedial relief which includes the power to grant compensation in appropriate cases where the fundamental rights of the poor and disadvantage persons are violated . “ 3. The Court held that the Court can appoint socio-legal commissions or devise any procedure and forge any tools it deems appropriate for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the poor “ . E* {1994} 1 SCC 243 “ If loss or injury is caused to a citizen by the arbitrary actions of State employees the State is liable to pay compensation to him . Public authorities who are entrusted with statutory function cannot act negligently . UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION SOVEREIGNTY IS VESTED IN THE PEOPLE. Every limb of the Constitutional machinery is obliged to be people oriented . .....” F* AIR 1986 SC – 847 : The court said that ‘ It is thus well established by the decisions of this Court that the provisions of Parts III and IV are supplementary and complementary to each other and that fundamental rights are but a means to achieve the goal indicated in part IV . It also held that the fundamental rights must be construed in the light of the directive principles “ G* {1993} 1 SCC 645 “ the fundamental rights and directive principles are supplementary and complementary to each other and the provisions in Part III should be interpreted having regard to the preamble and Directive Principles of the State Policy . The Directive Principles are also relevant to consider what are reasonable restrictions under Article 19. Article 19 permits the imposition of reasonable restrictions on the fundamental rights. A restriction which promotes any objective embodied in the directive Principles is usually considered reasonable by Courts of law . “ H* AIR 1983 SC 98 “ While Part III contains negative injunctions to the State not to do various things, Part IV contains positive commands to the State to promote what may be called a social and welfare State . “ I* In view of the Preamble emphasised for a Welfare State, the court established in AIR 1983 SC 624 “ the Courts have the responsibility to interpret the provisions of the Constitution in such a way so as to ensure the implementations of the directive principles and to harmonize the social objectives underlying the directives with the individual rights. This is the mandate of the Constitution not to the Legislature and the Executive only , but to the Courts as well . “ J* S.C. in AIR 1984 SC 802 held that “ the provisions conferring on the Supreme Court the power to enforce fundamental rights in the widest possible terms show the anxiety of the Constitution-makers not to allow any procedural technicalities to stand in the way of enforcement of fundamental rights. It is not all obligatory that an adversary procedure must be followed in proceedings under Art.32 for the enforcement of fundamental rights. There is no such compulsion in clause [2] of Art.32 or in any other part of the Constitution. Public interest litigations for the enforcement of fundamental rights is very much included in Art. 32. “ The Supreme court has now realised its proper role in a welfare State, and it is using this new strategy not only for helping the poor by enforcing their fundamental rights of persons but for the transformation of the whole society as an ordered and crime free society . The Supreme Court’s pivotal role in making up for the lethargy of the Legislature and the inefficiency of the Executive is commendable. Those who oppose to the growing judicial activism of the higher courts do not realise that it has proved a boon for the common men. Judicial activism has set right a number of wrongs committed by the States K* These A to J Judgements of H'ble Supreme Court are self explanatory for bringing Reformatory Regulations on : -the Issue of inevitable Implementation of Provisions Contemplated in Articles 38,39,41,45,46 -Revision of Punishments for Several Sections of IPC Mandating Compulsory Enforcement on Offences relating to Chapter VIII , IX , IX-A , X , XI , XIV , XV , and XVII L* The issues urged in 'K' above , the Judgements referred in 'A' to 'J' are basically within the Guarantees Contemplated in the Preamble of our Constitution and Endows Social and Economic Security bas well as Justified Political Ethics . The various incidents and Cases pertaining to Society Fraternity and Financial matters really tender the inevitable need of above Reformatory Regulations . more  

The remedy lies in India's transformation into the 'Largest Educational Democracy (LED)' but not simply the Biggest-Demo-Cracy (BDC). LED will definitely , according to my mind's ASNP (Analysis and Synthesis Natural Processes) , resolve the political chemistry of 1. Lower-Demo-cracy (LDC) 2. Upper-Demo-Cracy (UDC) I can form an Equation as below. BDC = LDC+UDC Transformation = 'LED vs BDC' ------>tends to substantial achievement of non-politicking and non-politicizing Crime . To achieve LED quality , India needs the SCUI (Senior Citizen University of India) in every Village. It is not too late even now in these times of the 21st Century . In addition to the above ASNP of mine , I have already found support and proof in Hinduism's Exploratory Research Study(s) of mine as follows. Crime or Adharma is the opposite quality of Justice or Dharma as per the Hinduism . So, the Almighty God Sri Maha Vishnu declared that Education is the only solution to Crime or Adharma and toward this, Vishnu granted the entire Education in the capsules of Hindu Vedas for us to study . more