Rajnath or Modi who is best PM.
If BJP would have not given the name of Modi as the Prime Ministerial candidate then it would have got some more seats. In fact instead of Modi Rajnath would have proved the good Prime Minister of India. Basic problem with Modi is he has got Hitler mentality, “nahi mafi nahi mangooga” no I will never apologise. Whereas Rajnath apologised on behalf of BJP and as the senior leader of BJP, whatever goes wrong to the Muslims, for no fault. In democracy adamancy is not acceptable but tolerance is acceptable.
Nowadays BJP is divided between Modi and BJP. Modi cadre is always proved to be communal, criminal, adamant, corrupt like Amit Shah, Meenakshi Leki, Jaynarayan Viyas, while BJP cadre Vajpayee group is liberal social and cordial, like Rajnath Singh, Sushma Swaraj, Shivraj Singh Chouhan. BJP is the biggest opposition party after Congress and if people like Modi who are adamant and never care the sentiments of the people of his own country then how they will become the good prime minister of the country like India.
Modi refused to put on the skull cap in a gathering of Muslims at communal Guj, on what grounds he may ask the vote of the community and why Muslims will cast vote on the name of Modi. In politics politicians should behave sensibly some time they would have to put on skull cap and some time they would have to apply tilak.
If people like Modi linked entire episode with the religion then it would not perfect, because in Hinduism there is no restriction to put on skull cap. This is the muddy mentality of Modi who linked the skull cap episode to the religion thinking that Muslims are not doing puja and not believing in Hindu deities then he will not put one skull cap. But in case of Muslims there is restriction on them and they are doing worship of single God that is also without image.
In my previous articles I expressed apprehension that if media and BJP will not stop giving undue importance to Modi then BJP will split in two parts. My forecast is proving right, nowadays people are asking vote on the name of Modi and not BJP, it implies that Modi has become bigger than party, which is not a good indication for the Democratic Party and the country like India; the thoughts may be good for the Hitler mentality people. Situation is like that party is following the orders of Modi and Modi is not following the orders of party. If anything which is not suitable to Modi he changes the entire part or portfolio of the party.
After become Prime Minister of India what is the guarantee that Modi will follow the path and instructions of party and will not amend any clauses and article of party manifesto according to his own will.
Jago India Jago, Sacchhe ko vote do ache ko vote do. Awake India cast vote to the good person, cast vote to the honest person.
Zuber Ahmed Khan more
Nowadays BJP is divided between Modi and BJP. Modi cadre is always proved to be communal, criminal, adamant, corrupt like Amit Shah, Meenakshi Leki, Jaynarayan Viyas, while BJP cadre Vajpayee group is liberal social and cordial, like Rajnath Singh, Sushma Swaraj, Shivraj Singh Chouhan. BJP is the biggest opposition party after Congress and if people like Modi who are adamant and never care the sentiments of the people of his own country then how they will become the good prime minister of the country like India.
Modi refused to put on the skull cap in a gathering of Muslims at communal Guj, on what grounds he may ask the vote of the community and why Muslims will cast vote on the name of Modi. In politics politicians should behave sensibly some time they would have to put on skull cap and some time they would have to apply tilak.
If people like Modi linked entire episode with the religion then it would not perfect, because in Hinduism there is no restriction to put on skull cap. This is the muddy mentality of Modi who linked the skull cap episode to the religion thinking that Muslims are not doing puja and not believing in Hindu deities then he will not put one skull cap. But in case of Muslims there is restriction on them and they are doing worship of single God that is also without image.
In my previous articles I expressed apprehension that if media and BJP will not stop giving undue importance to Modi then BJP will split in two parts. My forecast is proving right, nowadays people are asking vote on the name of Modi and not BJP, it implies that Modi has become bigger than party, which is not a good indication for the Democratic Party and the country like India; the thoughts may be good for the Hitler mentality people. Situation is like that party is following the orders of Modi and Modi is not following the orders of party. If anything which is not suitable to Modi he changes the entire part or portfolio of the party.
After become Prime Minister of India what is the guarantee that Modi will follow the path and instructions of party and will not amend any clauses and article of party manifesto according to his own will.
Jago India Jago, Sacchhe ko vote do ache ko vote do. Awake India cast vote to the good person, cast vote to the honest person.
Zuber Ahmed Khan more
Viewed by 153
Mr. Khan, I don't see any reason why Mr. Modi should take responsibility or apologize for the riots. It is clear that he is sorry (feels bad) for what happened. It was very unfortunate that we put religion ahead of human life time and again. It is also true that when Mr. Modi asked for help from other states, the request went unresponded and the delay caused escalation of riots. Everyone suffered, but today all religions are living in harmony in Gujarat. Who created a situation of harmony in the state if not the ruling government? So Mr. Modi refused to wear a skull cap. Just because he is a leader is he supposed to give up freedom of choice? And is that the only proof that he is open to all religions? Many Muslims and christians and other minorities have prospered and advanced in the state post the riots. Did Mr. Modi ever make a statement hinting towards the fact that he wont wear skull cap since muslims do not perform puja. As a journalist, I would expect you to make more responsible statements. It is true that he has now in many ways become larger than the party. Since years, Gandhi family has personified the Congress; today, Mr. Arvind Kejriwal is the face of AAP. How is this different? Mr. Ratan Tata is the face of Tata industries, does that mean no one else there works or that the entire success can be attributed to one person or that he is just being power hungry? I do not think so. It is simply that the Aam Aadmi needs a personal touch, a face. Be it anywhere is the world. I am as much in favor of a strong government who can start dealing with the issues grappling our country. I also believe in calling a spade a spade irrespective of who I support in the election. I believe that currently no party would be able to root out corruption, unemployment, crime etc in just the next 4 years; it is going to be a long process. The choice is between a party who ruled for more than 50 years and did more damage than good vs a party who was given a chance in Vidhan Sabha elections and folded under pressure rather than fighting back vs a party who has something to show even if it is in a few states. more
Apr 17
Zuberbhai I agree with your views and your analyses of Modi & BJP.In fact Ms Sitaraman should have been nominated and projected as P.M she is P.M Material it would have been direct contest between Sonia Gandhi and this would have brought the country to some relief but she do not have the money as Modi has.BJP has been brought by MODI sponsored by his Industrial friends. This election will be eye opener to all of us and that day is not far, we make see upraising as in Egypt. more
Apr 17
