SAFETY IS QUESTIONABLE - VERY QUESTIONABLE!
Cadbury fined Rs 50,000 for chocolates with bugs
Srikanth Aluri | TNN | Oct 26, 2017, 11:57 IST
Representative image.Representative image.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GUNTUR: Mondelez India Foods Private Ltd, the parent company of Cadbury India, was fined by the Consumer Forum of Guntur for supplying bacteria-contaminated chocolates to a consumer. Apart from paying a penalty of Rs 50,000 for causing mental agony, Mondelez has also been ordered to pay Rs 5,000 to the complainant, Darla Anupama.
IS THIS SAFE FOOD? PEOPLE BUY /CHILDREN FALL FOR THOSE!
WILL THE MANUFACTURERS NOTE THE CALLOUSNESS FACE D BT CONSUMERS? more
Srikanth Aluri | TNN | Oct 26, 2017, 11:57 IST
Representative image.Representative image.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GUNTUR: Mondelez India Foods Private Ltd, the parent company of Cadbury India, was fined by the Consumer Forum of Guntur for supplying bacteria-contaminated chocolates to a consumer. Apart from paying a penalty of Rs 50,000 for causing mental agony, Mondelez has also been ordered to pay Rs 5,000 to the complainant, Darla Anupama.
IS THIS SAFE FOOD? PEOPLE BUY /CHILDREN FALL FOR THOSE!
WILL THE MANUFACTURERS NOTE THE CALLOUSNESS FACE D BT CONSUMERS? more
Viewed by 682
View all 8 comments Below 8 comments
My view is what ever the GOVT may try GREED / LUST/JEALOUSY /INTENTION OF HARMING OTHERS AND MANY ILL MOTIVES CANNOT BE CONTROLLED UNLESS THE BRAINS ARE EDUCATED BY 'HUMANITY THOUGHTS' AND THATS POSSIBLE ONLY BY CHANGING EDUCATION SYSTEM AND EDUCATION 'INDIAN PHILOSOPHY TO ONE AND ALL' 'SATYAMEBA JAYATE ' WAS QUOTED FROM THAT PHILOSOPHY BY NEHRU BUT HE COULD NOT IMPLEMENT IT! 'DHARMANG BRIDDHING JATATANG KURUSWA" IS ANOTHER AND 'DHARMA' IS PERFORMED MORE BY TREATING ALL LIVING BEINGS AS MANIFESTATIONS OF GOD - CHEATINGS WILL STOP! THERE ARE MANY OTHERS NOT KNOWN TO A PERSON LOOKING LIKE MAN BUT BEHAVING WORSE THAN ANIMALS! more
Oct 28
For Cadbury imposing fine a very lenient matter. How this product became unfit for human consumption the plant should be held responsible. Company takes a view that shop keeper did not store item as required or sold old stock after expiry date. Whom you can hold accountable. more
Oct 26
Consumer forum can impose fine only and order to compensate the consumer. However the consumer must complaint to FSSAI and also draw samples under Section 40 of FSSA and can get tested fro Laboratory to prove that it was fit or unfit for consumption for human beings. Only then higher fine or criminal proceeding can be initiated and imprisonment provision is there under FSSA 2006 more
Oct 28
Financial impact now a days is immaterial as is kept in costing and recovered. A very wrong approach by authorities. more
Oct 26
There is incomplete corrective and no preventive action, has entry made in records of responsible control and assurance officials in department? Was recall procedure followed? Was system in place was audited? more
Oct 26
It is one example only. Let there be quick decision on complaints, then such companies will be careful. more
Oct 26
