SC
Why it is so that everything has to be done by the COURTS? Then let the country be governed by the Courts.
Disband the Parliament, Assemblies etc.
When it comes to raising SALARIES and PERKS for themselves, our MPs, MLAs etc. never ask the Courts. They do it themselves and thump the DESKS violently.
Why they cannot do other things which are in PUBLIC INTEREST? more
Disband the Parliament, Assemblies etc.
When it comes to raising SALARIES and PERKS for themselves, our MPs, MLAs etc. never ask the Courts. They do it themselves and thump the DESKS violently.
Why they cannot do other things which are in PUBLIC INTEREST? more
Viewed by 362
View all 22 comments Below 22 comments
Correct. The Politicians of power thirst and Hunger to rule , really twisted the issues both while on adoptation of the Constitution as well as the next moment . Amendments had to be made in 1950s , 60s , 70s upto 1978 on the most important issues of people , their right for Justified Rule of part IV had to be inserted in the PREAMBLE OF THE CONSTITUTION to Secure : JUSTICE , Moral , Social , Economic and , Political . EVEN THEN , THE POLITICIANS IGNORED THE BASIC CONCEPT OF PRINCIPLES OF RULE . Secondly , Highlighting Castes instead of Constitutionally set 'CLASSES ' === Economy & Polygamy Benefits being allowed on Conversion into TWO Foreign Religions SINCE AFTER INDEPENDENCE , ====is the root cause for Caste / Community & Religion based Vote Bank Agencies . This selfish option of Political Parties even turned against the SUPREME COURT'S direction for removing Creamy Layer from Castes in 92 & ; Direction for adoption of Uniform Civil Code in 95 . THE CONGRESS PARTY WITH THEIR ALLIES THUS STOOD AS THE GREAT WALL OF CHINA for the political selfishness in the POLITICAL DEMOCRACY . These are now to be set right with the objectives , Concept and spirit of the very Constitution . more
Aug 27
I understand the Constitution of India was drafted after referring to the several constitutions of western countries.If that be so, we have not even succeeded in 'copying' and framing a proper constitution!The repeated amendments are proof a bad constitution.I think it would be a great idea to redraft the entire constitution keeping in view modern principles, thoughts, aspirations, and principles. This may be impossible in the present political climate, but after the BJP scores the anticipated landslide victory in 2019, a new constitution may be framed. more
Aug 27
People feel politicians are only social cause. However, we forget that they have family responsibilities and they need financial resources for livelihood. It is different thing that they extract in multiple of their requirements and we blame them. Are all the corrupt people only from politicians lot or many of us contributors to corruption. If the courts do not look into then these people will loot and sell the country to outside world. This aspect should not be ignored by any one. more
Aug 26
Probably the contents have been misinterpreted. We need to take the things in right perspective. SHould not be in haste in reacting. more
Aug 29
Do you support the corrupt practices of the politicians? Should a person having family responsibilities engage in corruptions and their family members will welcome his dishonesty? Let these corrupt people find out some honest source of earnings for their livelihood and spare the nation and its people to live in peace and harmony. more
Aug 28
Unless every politician (to start with) thinks that he has work for Country, it is very unlikely to get good LAWS made. more
Aug 26
It is true , correct and only the alternative to enforce the objectives & Principles of Rule that called for inevitable QUIT INDIA Movement by our freedom fighters where beyond thousand lives & properties were sacrified . Such inspire only turned the Fate of ill-full politicians in 2014 and given Birth to these localcircles.com for this fundamental cause .
Our keeping together together shall definitely reach the goal of good governance with positive participation and solution oriented working together . more
Our keeping together together shall definitely reach the goal of good governance with positive participation and solution oriented working together . more
Aug 28
There are negligible instances when the government knocked the doors of the courts for a court verdict on any issue of public interests and majority of the write petitions are coming from citizens, specifically, from the victims/sufferers and the aggrieved ones praying for justice as the last option. We can just imagine as to what would have been the law & order situation of the entire nation in the event of making "3 talaques" an illegal act by the Parliament, though the issue was not taken to the SC by the government. Further, if we look back to the history of independent India, it would be crystal like clear that our Parliament & Legislative Assemblies have lost many golden opportunities to enact important laws in the interests of the country and its people due to nasty & narrow politics coupled with appeasement, keeping the nation's interests aside. Under such situations, one is left with only one option, that is to knock the courts' doors for justice. more
Aug 25
Both are absolutely correct and supported with records of Courts . Govet. System denied the justice is well proved althrough the period gone .
Any how , thee is the acute need of Citizen to step ahead and is why , some of our memebers thought of , and a Circle in the name of NLFNP is recently formed and to be still strengthened since individual attempts can not reach prompt attention as in the past even in the Supreme Court -- reference below :-
1. Once in 1982 & later in 1992 = Supreme Court had confined that “ We would therefore held that any member of the public having sufficient interest can maintain an action for judicial redress for public injury arising from breach of public duty or from violation of some provisions of the Constitution or the law and seek enforcement of such public duty and observance of such constitutional or legal provision. This is absolutely necessary for maintaining the rule of law , furthering the cause of justice and accelerating the pace of realisation of the Constitutional Objectives “ . Thus , the supreme court upheld the f RIGHT OF THE PRACTICING LAWYERS to maintain a writ petition under Art. 32 on matters affecting the independence of Judiciary .
2. The S.C. also cited == where a legal wrong or legal injury is caused to person or to a determinate class of persons by reason of violation of any constitutional or legal rights and such person or determinate class of persons is by reason of poverty , helplessness of disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position unable to approach the court for relief , any member of the public can maintain an application for an appropriate direction or order or writ in the High Court under Article 226 or in the case of breach of any Fundamental Right to the Court under Article 32 . ==
3. Even though the preamble as was the original contain the whole , to be in specific on certain prominent objectives of Freedom fighters caused for the inclusion for Secured Directives of Rule for the generations .
WHILE these the basics of the constitution , there had been many Supreme Court Judgements in many matters relevant to the Directive Principles those were set to achieve the comprehensive object of article 21 in the first , second and third decades of Independent Rule in India .
4. Even then , the Selfish Personalities staged that “ The court has no capacity to enforce its orders and in many cases the conditions have not changed . “ and the Honourable Court had to highlight the issues of 1. A Telegram forwarded under article 39 about the murder of his son in police lock-up filed by his father which was directed by the State high Court confining the importance of article 39 A . 2. The Court also taken-up such in form of a letter on white paper confining to article 32 and 39 in cases of hazardous livelihood and health loss due to Pollution from Industries etc.,
Supreme Court also had to give effect in the issues of Education , and suggested , directed the governments on application of Uniform Civil Code and even the implementation of Economic Creamy Layer of Castes to eradicate the Reservations and Relaxations to those Socially & Economically in reasonable status to full fill the real objective of applying to those only poor and poorest of the Poor in a justified carry of the concept of the Constitution .
It is true that “ Morality , Decency & Basic Education “ are the requisites in Citizen without which there cannot be a better Electorate and Justified rule while considering the above some of the unpleasant issues and the present status of our Statistics as at 2011 , we , the association of persons concluded to form this forum to work with keen interest for the better carry and substantial application of the provisions of the constitution through the provision of Rights to Constitutional Remedies with the following Objectives mainly .
As also deliberately staged by Dr. Ambedkar in his debate , the Citizen has the opportunity under article 32 but taken away through article 37 , 39 A also set inactive at selfish interest as confined by Sri Haque . Where as , the Preamble and the Objectives of the Constitution are still operative for public interest and Justified Rule in the country for which we have to try , try and Strive to achieve the good . more
Any how , thee is the acute need of Citizen to step ahead and is why , some of our memebers thought of , and a Circle in the name of NLFNP is recently formed and to be still strengthened since individual attempts can not reach prompt attention as in the past even in the Supreme Court -- reference below :-
1. Once in 1982 & later in 1992 = Supreme Court had confined that “ We would therefore held that any member of the public having sufficient interest can maintain an action for judicial redress for public injury arising from breach of public duty or from violation of some provisions of the Constitution or the law and seek enforcement of such public duty and observance of such constitutional or legal provision. This is absolutely necessary for maintaining the rule of law , furthering the cause of justice and accelerating the pace of realisation of the Constitutional Objectives “ . Thus , the supreme court upheld the f RIGHT OF THE PRACTICING LAWYERS to maintain a writ petition under Art. 32 on matters affecting the independence of Judiciary .
2. The S.C. also cited == where a legal wrong or legal injury is caused to person or to a determinate class of persons by reason of violation of any constitutional or legal rights and such person or determinate class of persons is by reason of poverty , helplessness of disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position unable to approach the court for relief , any member of the public can maintain an application for an appropriate direction or order or writ in the High Court under Article 226 or in the case of breach of any Fundamental Right to the Court under Article 32 . ==
3. Even though the preamble as was the original contain the whole , to be in specific on certain prominent objectives of Freedom fighters caused for the inclusion for Secured Directives of Rule for the generations .
WHILE these the basics of the constitution , there had been many Supreme Court Judgements in many matters relevant to the Directive Principles those were set to achieve the comprehensive object of article 21 in the first , second and third decades of Independent Rule in India .
4. Even then , the Selfish Personalities staged that “ The court has no capacity to enforce its orders and in many cases the conditions have not changed . “ and the Honourable Court had to highlight the issues of 1. A Telegram forwarded under article 39 about the murder of his son in police lock-up filed by his father which was directed by the State high Court confining the importance of article 39 A . 2. The Court also taken-up such in form of a letter on white paper confining to article 32 and 39 in cases of hazardous livelihood and health loss due to Pollution from Industries etc.,
Supreme Court also had to give effect in the issues of Education , and suggested , directed the governments on application of Uniform Civil Code and even the implementation of Economic Creamy Layer of Castes to eradicate the Reservations and Relaxations to those Socially & Economically in reasonable status to full fill the real objective of applying to those only poor and poorest of the Poor in a justified carry of the concept of the Constitution .
It is true that “ Morality , Decency & Basic Education “ are the requisites in Citizen without which there cannot be a better Electorate and Justified rule while considering the above some of the unpleasant issues and the present status of our Statistics as at 2011 , we , the association of persons concluded to form this forum to work with keen interest for the better carry and substantial application of the provisions of the constitution through the provision of Rights to Constitutional Remedies with the following Objectives mainly .
As also deliberately staged by Dr. Ambedkar in his debate , the Citizen has the opportunity under article 32 but taken away through article 37 , 39 A also set inactive at selfish interest as confined by Sri Haque . Where as , the Preamble and the Objectives of the Constitution are still operative for public interest and Justified Rule in the country for which we have to try , try and Strive to achieve the good . more
Aug 25
Something done under compulsion is never savory. No one (except the lawyers) goes to court by desire but under compulsion. We are contesting two matters in the Courts for last so many years but only under compulsion as the Govt. System denied the Justice. more
Aug 25
Whenever convenient, the Government throws the ball to Judiciaries court (read lap). But when it is inconvinient all the parlamenterians cry foul, Judiciary is overstepping its mandate !!! Let SC rule the salary, perks and pension cap / increment / decrement of parlamentarians and legislators. Wil they allow it ??? Were the PSU employess allowed to fix their own pay or perks ??? Then why should they be allowed ? more
Aug 25
Please read Mr. Ranjit Biswas's post, it is the common citizen and victims who bell the cat more
Aug 26
