Should schools be run asa business?- A look outside India
The quality of public schools can however vary a lot. In inner city areas catering to the low-income group, the school environment and quality of education may not be good (very much on par with our pathetic government schools). But schools located in affluent suburbs are excellent (they are rated as 9 or 10 in a scale of 1-10) which means that most of the children from these schools end up in Ivy-league (top ranking) universities. Some of these schools even cater specifically to gifted children (say the equivalent of top IIT rankers). This is the because of the fact that school grants are directly related to the taxes paid by people of a given neighborhood. Schools in affluent neighborhoods are funded better due to high tax amounts paid by the residents. Funding is low for inner city schools or those in poorer sections of a city and these are the lowest rated schools.
In US (as in most Western countries) education up to school secondary level is free and is accepted as the responsibility of the government. It is considered as an investment and not as a money-making operation by politically-connected/favoured individuals who run schools like mafia rackets. In India, taxes collected are frittered away in freebies to the undeserving, with the government acting as a sort of Robin Hood. Tax base is lopsided with a few taxpayers having to bear the burden of a huge part of the non-tax paying population who are either too poor or exempted (like big landowners) or are very good at tax evasion.
The West must be doing something right, seeing the amount of scientific research output, Nobel awardees and so on whereas Indians are looking always to getting technology hand-downs from those countries without contributing anything by way of new scientific breakthroughs or inventions, which is the direct result of our low quality of education both government and private. Even China is a lot better than us. more