What is the provision in law

The following, though a bit long, is my considered view on religions. We have let politicians to divide and rule on the basis of religions with vote bank in mind. This is what I wrote in my e-book "Success through Opposites" and I quote: " Religion vs. Religion: Let us see what we do with religions: Ingrained right from the childhood in our mind is the recording that "our" religion is the best. No wonder we all grow up thinking one religion is okay and the other is not. There are so many common aspects between religions and there are a few differences - that is why they are different religions! Therefore, no two religions are exactly opposite, so to say, because of the very many common values they preach. Even if no two religions are exactly opposites, we have made ourselves and other people feel that they are! If we are comfortable with one religion and any other also, there will be nothing like one is right and the other not so right, there will be no attempt to think that we have to "serve" or "defend" "our" religion. There won't be attempts at converting people from one to the other and "serving" the religion that way. So we "serve" or "defend" our respective religions vigorously, think only our religion is the "best" and end up as fundamentalists - either of a rather soft type or a violent one. By our uncontrolled, no-brake, staunchness for one religion, we are responsible for triggering the creation of the opposite: 1. Our no-brake conversion into our religion, beyond threshold, has created exactly the opposite of what we wanted to achieve and several governments are thinking of enacting a law against conversions from one religion to any other. 2. This has also created fundamentalists in the other religions either of a soft type or a violent one. Then we blame a particular religion itself as being fundamentalist! Yes, if the people in charge of interpretation have interpreted one aspect of a religion with a lot of motive energy and no adequate brake energy, that interpretation regarding that aspect of that religion becomes cancerous. This does not mean that the whole religion in question is cancerous but only the interpretation is. Such interpretations come from minds that are comfortable with only one religion. If we are comfortable with one religion and any other, we will adopt what ever any religion has to say at a suitable occasion automatically and make our lives comfortable and happy. Also, we forget that religions were created by human beings - or by Super human beings-as basically "way of life" for human beings, with the idea of making life of the people at large comfortable and happy. But our addiction to one and aversion or hate for the other has led to a situation where religion is being used as the cause for massacring thousands of innocent men, women and even children! Suicide squads are formed, trained and operated, ostensibly to help sustain or "defend" a religion. We are led to believe as though the religion will die if people, including children, do not die for the religion! Alternatively, we believe that unless we keep adding more and more numbers of people to our religion, our religion will get weaker and decay. So we keep converting thousands of innocent men, women and even children. This method is not exactly like that of a suicide squad that is using physical methods, but the softer version playing on the emotions of people-doing the same job. The followers of this method operate like multinational business organizations - having a target for the number to be converted around the world and exercising control over and monitoring the numbers through regular MIS (Management information system). The emotional blackmail used for conversion is as insidious as the physical force method. Instead of religion helping men, men profess to help survive or "defend" religions. If any religion needs the support of men instead of being of support to men, that religion is anyway on its decline, irrespective of its proponents' claim or its current membership! The worst thing, an unpardonable sin, that one can do is to tinker around with minds of people - particularly children' s minds in their very formative years-by bringing them to our way of thinking - which we may honestly feel is the only right way. Upon deeper examination, we will find the only right way as per our thinking is at best either cancerous or retarded - only because our mind is not comfortable with any other way This is particularly true of the thinking about religions that most of us have today and the way we perpetuate our view among future generations. I am sure by now that many who would have agreed largely with whatever I have written up to now, before I took up religion, would have started feeling somewhat or terribly uncomfortable. But both the basis of whatever I have said up to now and what I am saying about religions are based on the same principle of opposites - an energy law that is inviolable. When the mind is liberated from is liberated from the clutches of only one religion and is comfortable and happy with all, what a great mind it becomes! Truly such people are genuinely happy and they also spread happiness all around them - in the family, the society and the whole world. Compare this with the misery that is spread by the soft and hard options of forcing people to follow one or the other religion or ism. There has been a recent development and that is to create a new 'universal religion' as a solution to the problem created by several religions. But eventually, the children of these families will grow up thinking that this universal religion is the best and all others are not okay! So the solution is not creating yet another religion, as we have too many already. The solution is injecting the requisite opposite in our mind: I would even suggest that we follow the religion we dislike until we get comfortable with the religion we dislike too, and from then on we will be fine. Even the punishment for forcing people to follow one particular religion, either through soft or through hard methods, may be meted out in a commune in which these very people follow for a period of time the daily religious practices of the religion they were revolting against. Any religion is meant to be and is a tool in man's hands and not the other way around. Human beings are not born to be slaves - even to any religion - but born to be masters, even over religions. Let us not make another powerful tool, created and meant to make our lives happy and comfortable, the religion, a master over us." more  

@shri Uday B , In our country , facilities are being given on the basis of caste and religion , so it becomes necessary to define and understand such cases . Please tell me , if kids after becoming majority , want to leave caste and religion identity , than can they do it . Or is it necessary to adopt caste or religion so that one can be classified . You have said there is no any new system . I mean new system as the system of classification of society . more  

Let me share with you he legal and logical aspects: 1. caste and Religion ( as per old system ) of husband & wife remain unchanged - unless either one of them adopt the others. 2. There is NO NEW SYSTEM - but as stated earlier it remain unchanged - unless either one of them adopt the others. 3. They are entitled to avail all the benefits, as of earlier - as there is NO change is their status as far as befits are concern. Marriage does not change it. 4. if ----- of wife changes according to husband's category (NOT NECESSARY) , then will it not be male dominance system - NO. it is not because the wife (Or even Husband) adopt the other religion. AND if so then it may cease the benefits s well - depending on each circumstances. 5. ----- caste / religion & category of kids of such couples - till they attend their majority it will be of their Father BUT if the mother prefers to have her religion - she can do so for the kids. Once the kids become major they are free to adopt any of the religion - either of their parents OR even OTHER. 6.If wife is from backward class and husband is from open category , kids ---- will not be entitled to avail the Mother's benefits as the father's name, cast, religion prevails - unless the exception as mentioned above. 7. ----------- will be applicable to kids then will it be male dominant system. NO it will not, as the kids are free to adopt any of the religion on their own, so also the wife. 8. ------- kids will get reservation facilities or not . NO the kids will get the same category as of their father. 9. Should we consider new generation of such couples as Religion & caste less Citizens of India . No. Religion & caste is solely and totally is an INDIVIDUAL matter, can not be generalized to the entire society at large. IT IS TI BE NOTED THAT THE "Religion & caste" IS INDIVIDUAL MATTER WELL SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION, EVEN BY WAY OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. more  

Since 1947 law makers could not make laws PROPER FOR BHARATIYAS which were in turbulence due to many opposing situations NOW AT LEAST INDIA'S TRADITIONAL 'MARRIAGE & BANSHA' LAWS BE LAID IN SHASTRIB PATTERNS SO THAT PURITY OF BIRTHS REMAIN AND AFTER DEATH 'SHRADDHAKEIYAS' ARE RESULT GIVING! more  

I think presently, we have no clear laws to determine the religion or caste etc. in such circumstances but some follow their own systems. Left to me, we should put an end to the religion or castes system n learn to believe, we r all humans. Bodily n mentally cleanliness is important. No reservations at all based on the system of religion or caste, but concessions / reservations can be extended purely based on economic condition, which again may lead to corrupt practices. Stringent laws to deal with any corrupt practices should be enforced. more